Repetition has an odd relationship with the thoughts. Take the expertise of déjà vu, once we wrongly consider now we have skilled a novel state of affairs up to now – leaving you with a spooky sense of pastness. However now we have found that déjà vu is definitely a window into the workings of our reminiscence system.

Our analysis discovered that the phenomenon arises when the a part of the mind which detects familiarity de-synchronizes with actuality. Déjà vu is the sign which alerts you to this weirdness: it’s a sort of “fact checking” for the memory system.

However repetition can do one thing much more uncanny and weird. The other of déjà vu is “jamais vu”, when one thing you understand to be acquainted feels unreal or novel not directly. In our recent research, which has just won an Ig Nobel award for literature, we investigated the mechanism behind the phenomenon.

Jamais vu might contain taking a look at a well-recognized face and finding it suddenly unusual or unknown. Musicians have it momentarily – shedding their manner in a really acquainted passage of music. You could have had it going to a well-recognized place and turning into disorientated or seeing it with “new eyes”.

It’s an expertise which is even rarer than déjà vu and even perhaps extra uncommon and unsettling. Once you ask folks to explain it in questionnaires about experiences in every day life they provide accounts like: “Whereas writing in my exams, I write a phrase appropriately like ‘urge for food’ however I maintain wanting on the phrase over and over as a result of I’ve second ideas that it could be fallacious.”

In every day life, it may be provoked by repetition or staring, nevertheless it needn’t be. One among us, Akira, has had it driving on the motorway, necessitating that he pull over onto the arduous shoulder to permit his unfamiliarity with the pedals and the steering wheel to “reset”. Fortunately, within the wild, it’s uncommon.

Easy arrange

We don’t know a lot about jamais vu. However we guessed it will be fairly simple to induce within the laboratory. When you simply ask somebody to repeat one thing time and again, they usually discover it turns into meaningless and complicated.

This was the fundamental design of our experiments on jamais vu. In a primary experiment, 94 undergraduates spent their time repeatedly writing the identical phrase. They did it with twelve completely different phrases which ranged from the commonplace, comparable to “door”, to much less frequent, comparable to “sward”.

We requested contributors to repeat out the phrase as shortly as attainable, however instructed them they had been allowed to cease, and gave them a number of explanation why they may cease together with feeling peculiar, being bored or their hand hurting. Stopping as a result of issues started to really feel unusual was the commonest possibility chosen, with about 70% stopping a minimum of as soon as for feeling one thing we outlined as jamais vu. This normally occurred after about one minute (33 repetitions) – and sometimes for acquainted phrases.

In a second experiment we used solely the phrase “the”, figuring that it was the commonest. This time, 55% of individuals stopped writing for causes in step with our definition of jamais vu (however after 27 repetitions).

Individuals described their experiences as starting from “They lose their which means the extra you take a look at them” to “appeared to lose management of hand” and our favourite “it doesn’t appear proper, virtually appears to be like prefer it’s probably not a phrase however somebody’s tricked me into pondering it’s.”

It took us round 15 years to write down up and publish this scientific work. In 2003, we had been appearing on a hunch that individuals would really feel bizarre whereas repeatedly writing a phrase. One among us, Chris, had seen that the traces he had been requested to repeatedly write as a punishment at secondary college made him really feel unusual – as if it weren’t actual.

It took 15 years as a result of we weren’t as intelligent as we thought we had been. It wasn’t the novelty that we thought it was. In 1907, one in all psychology’s unsung founding figures, Margaret Floy Washburn, printed an experiment with one in all her college students which confirmed the “lack of associative energy” in phrases that had been stared at for 3 minutes. The phrases turned unusual, misplaced their which means and have become fragmented over time.

We had reinvented the wheel. Such introspective strategies and investigations had merely fallen out of favor in psychology.

Deeper insights

Our distinctive contribution is the concept that transformations and losses of which means in repetition are accompanied by a specific feeling – jamais vu. Jamais vu is a sign to you that one thing has become too automatic, too fluent, too repetitive. It helps us “snap out” of our present processing, and the sensation of unreality is the truth is a actuality test.

It is sensible that this has to occur. Our cognitive programs must stay flexible, permitting us to direct our consideration to wherever is required reasonably than getting misplaced in repetitive duties for too lengthy.

We’re solely starting to know jamais vu. The principle scientific account is of “satiation” – the overloading of a illustration till it turns into nonsensical. Associated concepts embrace the “verbal transformation effect” whereby repeating a phrase time and again prompts so-called neighbors so that you simply begin off listening to the looped phrase “tress” time and again, however then listeners report listening to “gown,” “stress,” or “florist”.

It additionally appears associated to analysis into obsessive compulsive dysfunction (OCD), which looked at the effect of compulsively looking at objects, comparable to lit gasoline rings. Like repeatedly writing, the results are unusual and imply that actuality begins to slide, however this may assist us perceive and deal with OCD. If repeatedly checking the door is locked makes the duty meaningless, it is going to imply that it’s troublesome to know if the door is locked, and so a vicious cycle begins.

In the end, we’re flattered to have been awarded the Ig Nobel Prize for literature. The winners of those prizes contribute scientific works which “make you snort after which make you assume”. Hopefully our work on jamais vu will encourage extra analysis and even higher insights within the close to future.

Article written by Akira O’Connor, Senior Lecturer in Psychology, University of St Andrews and Christopher Moulin, Professor of cognitive neuropsychology, Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)

This text is republished from The Conversation below a Artistic Commons license. Learn the original article.

You may additionally be enthusiastic about: